Proposition 8 and its Discontents: An interview by Gregory Van Wagenen
by Gregory Van Wagenen
The ballot initiative known as Proposition 8, which effectively modified the constitution of the State of California, was arguably the most contentious issue in North American politics in 2008. On the 5th of November last year, after passing with a three percent margin, the foundation of the state’s legal authority was re-written to mandate that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Below is an interview with James, who is a gay member of the LDS Church. James discusses his views on Proposition 8, and how strong LDS support for the legislation affected his experience in the church.
Gregory: Has your relationship with the LDS Church changed since the Proposition 8 debate? If so, how?
James: The church’s open stance made me feel ostracized. I felt voiceless in a sea of open hostility and ignorance.
I am a strong believer in separation of church and state. Religion to me is a personal matter. I do not feel comfortable pressing my personal beliefs on other people nor do I feel comfortable when other people force their views, religious or otherwise, on me. My relationship with God is a personal one – as is anyone’s... when I pray to God I feel a love and sense of acceptance greater than I have ever felt. God created and loves me as I am; so when I go to church and am told that “those people are wrong” and “those people need to be saved” and “those people are waging war against God by defacing marriage,” I do not see it.
I know I am gay. I did not ask or choose this and I could reject God altogether, but I love the Creator. The message of the Church is perfect but right now many of the members are not. The message of Christ’s love for mankind is tarnished with a message of “God loves you unless...” The comments and views of many of the members put a wedge between me and God. So I have stopped attending. I still maintain my relationship with God and since I do not feel comfortable in my Church I have left it.
There was a network of bloggers that helped me stay in the Church longer than I would have. And it also helped that there was a fellow member who was struggling under the burden of the same cross I was. It helped to have someone to confide in. At my low points he would build me up and in his I would build him up. After moving across the country it became harder though. With no one to share that struggle with it became impossible to stay in.
Gregory: How comfortable do you feel vocalizing your position on the issue of sexuality within the church? Do you feel silenced or encouraged to speak?
James: Usually I wasn’t the one who would bring up the subject, but rather other members. I would try to chime in with something that leaned in favor of gay rights or issues but was bulldozed down and looked at as simply short of the Truth. I even tried to mention the fact that many teenage suicides result when young people cannot love themselves because their religion or society makes it hard for them to do so. It is as if you have to change a part of you to fit in. As if you are a puzzle piece. And if you don’t fit in with the cookie cutter image then you are tossed out.
Many men even marry women just to stay in the Church, but can you structure a marriage on a lie? Is that what God would want? Is it better to lie and fit in than to accept who you are and love yourself? Many people in my last branch [congregation] said that the Church was being persecuted [for its support for Prop 8]... but I feel that word is thrown around too loosely. This made me closet my opinion. In a sense I felt censored by the sentiment and clanging opinion of my fellow members.
Gregory: Were you ever troubled by the fact that religious leaders seemed to be giving political advice in a spiritual context?
James: Of course. There are so many other pertinent issues that need to be faced here and abroad. People need to be brought together not torn apart. And that is just what happened to many families in the church over that. If we are going to be a Church of Christ we need to accept people for all their “faults” and love them. But if Christian churches continue to make this a wedge-issue, more and more people, gay or not, are going to further marginalize them.
Gregory: If there were one message you could send to the wider world about your experience as a gay Mormon, what would it be?
James: I would like to say that I feel both sides were in the wrong in California (and not just there but seemingly abroad). Christian and Gay militancy are much the same. Both are binary: closeted or liberated, damned or saved; both demand emotional showboating and almost narcissistic public displays of emotion and both seek to turn private lives into public crusades or moral right. And both are impatient to the quirks and kinks of human behavior. There is no middle ground and in a country as diverse as this there must be.
I would also like to add that the Church has enriched my life, and the principles I glean from the Gospel like charity and love I make a point to act on. I follow Jesus’ example of universal love and I follow what the Bible so clearly states – “Judge not lest ye be judged”. I have met many a good person in the Church who I love. Even though a few of them no longer love me after I shared with them a certain aspect of who I am.
that a compliment. I try to be. So I know your feeling of frustration being among so
many good people who do not agree with you. I'm not trying to compare my plight
to yours. Yours is unique and you have my sympathy.
However, I agree with the Church's Proclamation to the World. I voted for
Proposition 8 and I supported it. I supported it because the "Proclamation"
emanates from our Church Presidency who we accept as authority from God.
Furthermore, I support it viscerally as well as logically.
I don\'t see it as relevant to separation of Church and State. My only problem with
the Church's position is that I feel they are putting too much emphasis on
homosexuality or gay marriage as a threat to the traditional family as opposed to
poverty, lack of health care, infidelity, familial abuse, and substance abuse. In fact,
I
don't really see gay marriage as a threat to the traditional and critical important role
of the family in our Church or our society.
Personally, I agree with the rights of gay couples to all the legal privileges of
marriage (with the exception of child adoption) and my question is, "how big IS the
problem? How many gay couples are there? I work in the Temple and it is an
annoyance in having to change civil marriage document such as Partner 1 and
Partner 2, as opposed to husband or wife. And I find that distasteful. I feel that
eventually gay marriages will be legalized but that's not really so important to me
and my beliefs. I feel that marriage will always be between a man and a woman
and
I don't believe civil law can change that.
I am somewhat concerned, in fact quite concerned, with the Church\'s ad hoc
partnership with fundamentalist Christians who I see as a threat to our world. I
think
we were taken in. Although we are a small percentage of the Christians who were
involved, we took the majority of the "blame." I really think the Church will back off
their formal involvement in the future. Just an opinion.
My sympathy for you is real. I know you did not choose your sexual orientation
and
I don't have an answer except to advise you to stay in the Church. There are many
who have problems worse than yours. God does love you and the Church is the
only chance for eternal salvation and exaltation. Mortal life is just a while.
uncomfortable in the company of the Church, and I oftentimes feel it's a shame with
how much emphasis is put on seemingly superficial characteristics of people. I am
not a resident of California, but I would have voted against Proposition 8, in large
measure because I feel it very unnecessary. I feel direct involvement in legislating
marriage law is not the church's place if only because of our previous criminal marriage
behavior with polygamy. We begged for the right to marry the way we felt was right in
the past. I hope we can be sensitive to others desire to do the same.
try to claim solidarity with James by saying you support him and understand that
his is a hard cross to bare. But then, in the next breath you affirm the hateful
statements that cause James\'s life to be so difficult. You affirm that James is
broken, a mistake, a cursed soul whose only option is to remain celibate, alone,
and miserable.
When will Mormons realize that you can\'t have it both ways. You can\'t claim to
love gays then try to fix them. Your attempts to fix homosexuals is affirmation of
your belief that they are inherently in need of fixing. A homosexual doesn\'t want a
hug from you telling them that God will fix them in the next life. They want a hug
from a person telling them that they are loved and desired just as they are.
Basically, they want the same thing that heterosexuals want: love.
try to claim solidarity with James by saying you support him and understand that
his is a hard cross to bare. But then, in the next breath you affirm the hateful
statements that cause James\\\'s life to be so difficult. You affirm that James is
broken, a mistake, a cursed soul whose only option is to remain celibate, alone,
and miserable.
When will Mormons realize that you can\\\'t have it both ways. You can\\\'t claim to
love gays then try to fix them. Your attempts to fix homosexuals is affirmation of
your belief that they are inherently in need of fixing. A homosexual doesn\\\'t want
a
hug from you telling them that God will fix them in the next life. They want a hug
from a person telling them that they are loved and desired just as they are.
Basically, they want the same thing that heterosexuals want: love.
I think issues facing people who are both gay and Mormon are so much greater than those of us who are both heterosexual and Mormon can really comprehend. Personally, I don't know many people who are both gay and "active" Mormon--I know several who have left the Church because they could not reconcile the two--but I tend to think there are probably more who are attracted to both the Church and to members of the same sex than one might guess. I have a hard time believing, though, that the Lord really wants these members to be driven out. We have been taught that homosexuality is a sin and the scriptures tell us that the Lord cannot "look upon sin with the least degree of allowance," but they never say He looks up on sinners in the same way.
I think we need to do a little bit less judging, bearing in mind that one can also be "damned" for "small" sins, too. I wonder if some people forget that in condemning homosexuality they run the very real risk of committing sins of pride--remember, President Benson's talk about how pride pits individuals against God and other people. In that same talk he said, "There is no such thing as righteous pride."